Skip to main content

Table 6 Integration of qualitative themes and quantitative indicators, HAI Network’s BSI surveillance evaluation, India, 2022

From: Implementing a healthcare-associated bloodstream infection surveillance network in India: a mixed-methods study on the best practices, challenges and opportunities, 2022

Domain

Qualitative themes

Corresponding quantitative indicator result

Best practices

Developed a resource-appropriate case definition

Simplicity: easy to apply case definition

 

Established a network-based surveillance to detect BSI trends and outbreaks

Stability: All 21 (100%) sites checked had access to 24 by 7 lab facility

Sensitivity and PPV: Checked events had 100% PPV and 100% sensitivity

Sensitivity: Sensitive in detecting BSI trends from May 2017 to Dec 2021

One outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia detected in the network using surveillance data

 

Ensured regular ongoing IPC trainings with Quality Improvement (QI) projects

Acceptability: 90% physicians surveyed starting a QI initiative in their ICU based on the feedback received from surveillance

Usefulness: 70% reported the feedback and trainings affecting care in the ICU by improving documentation of, and increasing adherence to, recommended central-line practices, 31% sites implemented one or more QI measures to decrease BSI rates

Challenges

Limited human resources

 
 

Lack of digitalization of medical and laboratory records

Stability: 76% sites had access to all positive cultures, required for classifying BSI type, rest 24% did not have LIS, recorded lab results in manual registers

Stability: 71% sites capture missing cases at end of month

Simplicity: 80% of surveyed surveillance staff reported spending two hours or more per day collecting data from paper-based reports

 

Variable blood culturing practices

Representativeness: 55% had their blood cultured with 44% cultured within 24 h of a febrile episode

Survey: 50% physicians reported culturing 80% of the febrile patients

Timeliness: 44% of the febrile episodes reviewed had blood cultured within 24 h

 

Inconsistent information sharing and data use

Timeliness: 6/10 (60%) ICU physicians reported getting consistent monthly feedback

 

Funding and sustainability

Stability: reporting ICUs decreased to 63/131 (48%) and reporting sites to 30/39 (77%) during quarter 4, 2021 when funding was interrupted

 

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

Stability: Surveillance stopped in 22/39 (56%) sites during March–April 2020 as staff were absorbed in COVID-19 duties

Opportunities

Awareness and acceptance of BSI surveillance among participating sites

Acceptability: Acceptable among stakeholders at national and site level