Skip to main content

Table 3 Evaluation results of HAI Network’s BSI Surveillance system attributes, India, 2022

From: Implementing a healthcare-associated bloodstream infection surveillance network in India: a mixed-methods study on the best practices, challenges and opportunities, 2022

Attribute

Indicator

Evidence collected

Assessment

Overall evaluation

Simplicity

Ease of collecting data

• Minimum 2 full-time surveillance staff

• 80% staff spends > 2 h or more every day in collecting the 23 variables and the lab confirmation for case confirmation from paper-based reports

Time-consuming

Simple

Ease of applying case definition

• 15/20 (75%) staff rate it as very easy or easy

Easy

Ease of online reporting

• 18/20 (90%) rate it as very easy or easy

• 10–15 min to submit one CRF, described as “user-friendly”

Easy

Levels of reporting

• Two a) Local (hospital administration), and b) National (AIIMS, New Delhi)

Easy

Stability

Reliability

• All 40 staff surveyed are trained in protocol

• All 21 sites reviewed collected denominator data on all days including weekends/holidays

• All 21 sites reviewed have access to a 24 by 7 working laboratory

• 16/21 sites reviewed have access to all positive cultures, required for classifying BSI type

• 5/21 sites reviewed reported not having LIS/ HMIS, reported using manual registers

• 15/21 (71%) sites review every positive culture at month-end to capture missing cases

Reliable

Stable if funding is available

Availability

• Available from 2017 including during second wave of COVID-19 in India

• Decreased reporting to 84/131 (64%) in ICUs and surveillance stopped in 22/39 (56%) sites seen briefly during April 2020

Available

Sustainability

• 26/39 (67%) of the sites are funded by US CDC

• Reporting decreased to 63/131 (48%) in the quarter 4, 2021 when funding was interrupted

Funding stability a concern

Acceptability

Willingness of stakeholders to participate

• Started with 20 ICUs in 2017 and has increased to 131 ICUs in 2019

• Hospital administration of all 10 hospitals interviewed accepts this system is required to control multi-drug resistant pathogens

High

Acceptable

Proportion of physicians accepting feedback from the surveillance system

• 90% physicians surveyed starting a QI initiative in their ICU based on the feedback received from surveillance

 

Representativeness

Population representative of the participating hospital

• 32/58 (55%) of the febrile episodes reviewed had their blood cultured

Not representative

Not representative

Data Quality

Data validity

• 280/284 (98%) of CRFs reviewed have correctly applied the case definition

Valid

Data quality is good

Data completeness

• 259/284 (91%) of CRFs have data filled in each data va without any missing details

Complete

Timeliness

Blood collection

• 27/61 (44%) of febrile episodes reviewed were cultured (blood collection) < 24 h of fever

Not timely

Blood culture collection and feedback to ICU physicians is not timely

Reporting to network

• 36/39 (92%) sites reported data within 10 days of the reporting month

Timely

Dissemination to key stakeholders

• 6/10 (60%) ICU physicians surveyed reported getting consistent monthly feedback

• 13/14 (93%) quarterly reports shared by AIIMS with all key stakeholders within one month of the reporting quarter

Not timely

Timely

Detection of BSI outbreaks

• Sites not comfortable in sharing information regarding outbreaks detected in their hospitals, hence this information could not be captured

• One outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia detected in the network using surveillance data and controlled (retrieved from published data)

–––

Sensitivity

True cases detected

• 26/26 (100%) cases reviewed during site visit were correctly identified

Sensitive

Sensitive

Monitoring trends

• System can identify BSI trends from May 2017 to December 2021

Sensitive

Early warning signals generated

• System has generated 684 ICU specific BSI rate alerts from May 2017 to December 2021

• Alerts are generated when ICU specific BSI rates are > 20 for that month

Sensitive

Positive Predictive Value

Proportion of true cases with confirmed BSI

• 26/26 (100%) cases reported as BSI for the months of November 2021 to March 2022 were reviewed and found to be true cases

Good

Good PPV

Usefulness

Monitoring trends

Detecting outbreaks

Improving IPC

• Quarterly trend analysis done for every quarter from Jan 2018 to Dec 2018

• Three outbreaks detected including one outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia using surveillance data and controlled (retrieved from published data)

• 12/39 (31%) sites have completed/ongoing QI projects to improve BSI rates

• 7/10 (70%) physicians surveyed reported having increased adherence to recommended Central Line insertion and maintenance practices following feedback from the system

Useful

Useful