Skip to main content

Table 1 Advantages and limitations of strategies for monitoring environmental hygiene

From: Hand and environmental hygiene: respective roles for MRSA, multi-resistant gram negatives, Clostridioides difficile, and Candida spp.

Method

Advantages

Limitations

Visual assessments [181, 233, 234]

Possible in all facilities; does not require special equipment; requires less time than other methods; direct observation of and feedback to EVS personnel are possible

Cannot detect residual surface contamination

Direct observation of EVS personnel [229, 235,236,237]

Can identify suboptimal technique; has contributed to reduction of MDRO transmission

Time consuming; not feasible in some circumstances

Fluorescent markers [46, 179, 181, 190, 230, 233,234,235, 238, 239]

Multiple studies support its use. Has been shown to improve cleaning compliance rates, reduce surface contamination, nosocomial transmission, and HAIs caused by MDROs. Can provide useful feedback to EVS staff

Complete marker removal does not assure elimination of MDROs from surface; EVS staff occasionally use black light to identify marked surfaces and prioritize those surfaces. Somewhat time-consuming, unless a representative sample of surfaces is selected

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) assays [179, 181, 233, 234, 236, 240,241,242,243]

Can provide immediate feedback to EVS staff and identify variations in cleaning practices. Associated with improved cleaning practices during CRE and CRAB outbreaks; may be useful in monitoring disinfection of CDI patient rooms. Associated with greater reduction of MDRO colonization/infection than fluorescent markers in a cluster-randomized trial

Detects both microorganisms and other organic material; poor correlation between ATP readings and level of microbial contamination; results may vary depending on microbe present. Some disinfectants may cause falsely low assay results. Relatively expensive

Culturing surfaces [8, 28, 46, 54, 67, 181, 229, 233, 241, 244]

Can identify pathogens, including MDROs, on surfaces before and after routine disinfection. Swabs, sponges, contact plates and dip slides can be used to sample surfaces

Requires additional laboratory capabilities; results not available for 24–72 h; relatively expensive; requires the use of a neutralizer if surfaces have been disinfected with a product with residual activity

  1. ATP—adenosine triphosphate; CDI—C. difficile infection; CRE—carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; CRAB—carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; EVS—environmental services personnel; HAIs—healthcare-associated infections; MDRO—multidrug-resistant organisms