Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of MRSA transmissions and incidental findings among screened contacts, sorted by setting and hospital

From: Rate of nosocomial MRSA transmission evaluated via contact screening

Type of contact

No. contacts

No. likely transmissions

No. incidental findings

NNS

Transmission rate (%)

CI 95%

All contacts*

27,377

41

72

667

0.15%

0.11–0.20%

HCW Clinic total

15,874

19

22

835

0.12%

0.07–0.2%

HCW Clinic LUMC

5648

8

8

706

0.14%

 

HCW Clinic Haga

6935

10

14

694

0.14%

 

HCW Clinic RdGG

3291

1

3

3291

0.03%

 

HCW Outpatient total

2834

0

4

 

>0.001–0.09%

HCW Outpatient LUMC

712

0

0

  

HCW Outpatient Haga

1751

0

4

  

HCW Outpatient RdGG

371

0

0

  

Patient total

4816

22

37

219

0.46%

0.29–0.68%

Patient LUMC

454

6

0

76

1.32%

 

Patient Haga

4054

13

37

312

0.32%

 

Patient RdGG

308

3

0

103

0.97%

 

HCW unspecified

2780

0

8

   

Non-specified

1073

0

1

   
  1. * ‘All contacts’ include 2780 HCW with unknown setting and 1073 contacts of unknown type.
  2. For the 2780 HCW of unknown type, it was unclear if the contact occurred in an outpatient or ward setting. Similarly, no information was recorded for the unknown type contacts regarding the setting or whether they involved patients or HCW.
  3. HCW Clinic: inpatient setting on the ward, HCW Outpatient: outpatient setting, Patient: patient-to-patient contacts, Number of Transmissions/Incidental Findings: This number is based on a comparison between the typing results of the detected MRSA isolates from the index cases and from their contacts. All matching isolates are considered likely transmissions, while the remaining cases are classified as incidental findings.
  4. NNS: Number of contacts needed to screen to detect one transmission.
  5. “–“indicates not applicable.
  6. CI 95%: The accuracy of the proportions of transmission to contacts as calculated by means of Jeffrey’s method