Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate Analysis of Risk Factors for MTB infection of TB Contacts

From: Surveillance of close contacts of patients with infectious tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study

Risk factor

Negative IGRAs

Positive IGRAs

Total

P value

(n = 97)

(n = 87)

(n = 184)

Sex

   

0.685

Male

34 (35.1%)

33 (37.9%)

67 (36.4%)

 

Female

63 (64.9%)

54 (62.1%)

117 (63.6%)

 

Age

   

*0.013

5–20 years

5 (5.2%)

10 (11.5%)

15 (8.2%)

 

20–60 years

80 (82.5%)

55 (63.2%)

135 (73.4%)

 

> 60 years

12 (12.4%)

22 (25.3%)

34 (18.5%)

 

Residence a

   

*0.016

Local

68 (70.1%)

46 (52.9%)

114 (62.0%)

 

Migrant

29 (29.9%)

41 (47.1%)

70 (38.0%)

 

Ethnic

   

0.845

Han nationality

91 (93.8%)

81 (93.1%)

172 (93.5%)

 

other nationality

6 (6.2%)

6 (6.9%)

12 (6.5%)

 

Education

   

0.641

Junior high school and below

26 (26.8%)

28 (32.2%)

54 (29.3%)

 

high school

20 (20.6%)

19 (21.8%)

39 (21.2%)

 

College degree and above

51 (52.6%)

40 (46.0%)

91 (49.5%)

 

BMI (kg/m2) b

   

0.604

< 18.5

6 (6.2%)

8 (9.2%)

14 (7.6%)

 

18.5–24

39 (40.2%)

30 (34.5%)

69 (37.5%)

 

> 24

52 (53.6%)

49 (56.3%)

101 (54.9%)

 

HIV

   

0.697

Negative

20 (20.6%)

20 (23.0%)

40 (21.7%)

 

Unknown

77 (79.4%)

67 (77.0%)

144 (78.3%)

 

Comorbidity

   

**0.006

No

84 (86.6%)

61 (70.1%)

145 (78.8%)

 

Yes

13 (13.4%)

26 (29.9%)

39 (21.2%)

 

Frequency of colds

   

0.291

0–1

72 (74.2%)

70 (80.5%)

142 (77.2%)

 

2–3

25 (25.8%)

16 (18.4%)

41 (22.3%)

 

≥ 4

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.1%)

1 (0.5%)

 

BCG scar

   

**0.005

No

16 (16.5%)

30 (34.5%)

46 (25.0%)

 

Yes

81 (83.5%)

57 (65.5%)

138 (75.0%)

 

History of tuberculosis

   

0.065

No

97 (100.0%)

84 (96.6%)

181 (98.4%)

 

Yes

0 (0.0%)

3 (3.4%)

3 (1.6%)

 

History of tuberculosis in family

   

0.192

No

2 (2.1%)

5 (5.7%)

7 (3.8%)

 

Yes

95 (97.9%)

82 (94.3%)

177 (96.2%)

 

Relationship with the index case

   

0.252

Conjugal

29 (29.9%)

29 (33.3%)

58 (31.5%)

 

Children

43 (44.3%)

38 (43.7%)

81 (44.0%)

 

Grandchildren

12 (12.4%)

4 (4.6%)

16 (8.7%)

 

Other

13 (13.4%)

16 (18.4%)

29 (15.8%)

 

Degree of closeness

   

0.358

≤ 1 h per day

18 (18.6%)

12 (13.8%)

30 (16.3%)

 

1–3 h per day

13 (13.4%)

19 (21.8%)

32 (17.4%)

 

3–5 h per day

17 (17.5%)

13 (14.9%)

30 (16.3%)

 

5–8 h per day

6 (6.2%)

2 (2.3%)

8 (4.3%)

 

≥ 8 h per day

43 (44.3%)

41 (47.1%)

84 (45.7%)

 

Medication

   

0.912

No

95 (97.9%)

85 (97.7%)

180 (97.8%)

 

Yes

2 (2.1%)

2 (2.3%)

4 (2.2%)

 

Degree of Xpert (Index cases)

   

**0.000

Lowc

44 (45.4%)

35 (40.2%)

79 (42.9%)

 

Medium

48 (49.5%)

39 (44.8%)

87 (47.3%)

 

High

5 (5.1%)

13 (14.9%)

18 (9.8%)

 

Index Situation

    

Subclinical TBd

9 (9.3%)

8 (9.2%)

17 (9.2%)

1.000

Active TB

88 (90.7%)

79 (90.8%)

167 (90.8%)

 
  1. a Residence of the follow-up contacts divided into two categories: One was “local”, that is, the follow-up personnel whose domicile was Beijing; The other is “Migrant” whose domicile is not in Beijing
  2. b BMI, body mass index
  3. c Low degree of Xpert included extremely low and low TB DNA detected
  4. d Subclinical TB was defined as bacteriologically-confirmed but negative on symptom screening