Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

Fig. 3

From: Evaluation of a multifaceted implementation strategy for semi-automated surveillance of surgical site infections after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a multicentre pilot study in the Netherlands

Fig. 3

Barriers and facilitators for implementation of automated surveillance. Barriers and facilitators [24] based on survey results among stakeholders of the implementation of automated surveillance of surgical site infections after hip or knee arthroplasty. The ‘n=’ behind the propositions indicates the number of total respondents to that specific proposition. For visualisation purposes, the barriers were rewritten to facilitators

Back to article page

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

ISSN: 2047-2994

Contact us