Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Categories for strength of each recommendation

From: APSIC guide for prevention of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs)

Category

Definition

Categories for strength of each recommendation

A

Good evidence to support a recommendation for use

B

Moderate evidence to support a recommendation for use

C

Insufficient evidence to support a recommendation for or against use

D

Moderate evidence to support a recommendation against use

E

Good evidence to support a recommendation against use

Grade

Definition

Categories for quality of evidence on which recommendations are made

I

Evidence from at least one properly randomized, controlled trial

II

Evidence from at least one well-designed clinical trial without randomization, from cohort or case-controlled analytic studies, preferably from more than one centre, from multiple time series, or from dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments

III

Evidence from opinions of respected authorities on the basis of clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees