Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 New methods for duodenoscope reprocessing

From: A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments

Method

Phase of development

Advantages

Disadvantages

References

Single-use duodenoscope

Implemented

No need for reprocessing, non-toxic

High costs, quality of duodenoscope

[96,97,98]

Bioburden assays

Implemented

Quick and easy to use

Lack of correlation with microbial culture

[99,100,101,102,103]

Electrolyzed acidic water

Endoscope tested

No biofilm fixation, non-toxic

Preparation on site needed

[104,105,106,107,108,109,110]

Vaporized hydrogen peroxide plasma

Endoscope tested

No aeration needed, non-toxic

Material incompatibility

[73, 79, 111,112,113,114,115]

Cavitation

Not tested

Potentially effective against biofilm, non-toxic

No disinfecting properties

[116]

Methylene blue photodynamic therapy

Model tested

Effective against biofilm, limited toxicity

Practical application lacking

[117]

Plasma-activated gas

Model tested

Non-toxic

Short-lived effect

[118]